Blog: Turning Global Disability Summit promises into reality

© Giacomo Pirozzi, Panos Pictures

Jul 2019
22/07/2019

A year ago, the UK Department for International Development (DFID), together with the International Disability Alliance and the Government of Kenya, hosted the first ever Global Disability Summit in London. Big promises were made by the 360 signatories who signed the Summit’s Charter for Change- but the question remains as to how those can be translated into real change.

The event brought together thousands of educators, researchers, policymakers and activists who came to achieve a common aim: to ensure the rights, freedoms, dignity and inclusion for all persons with disabilities.  Expectations were (and still are very high). We called for an explicit commitment to inclusive education for children with disabilities and a new Inclusive Education Initiative (IEI), a multi-donor trust fund overseen by the World Bank, was announced.

So now the commitments have been made, and the energy is there, how can global decision makers and funders actually deliver on the promises? Leaders should embrace the Three ‘R’s’ of Rights, Resources and Research (pdf):  

  • Rights – Education for all cannot be realised without the inclusion of all marginalized groups, and particularly children with disabilities. Children with disabilities have rights to schools and in schools. They should not only be able to access schools, but also be given the opportunity to be involved in the teaching and learning process. Most importantly, they have a right to be counted so that they are not invisible in monitoring and accountability processes. Disaggregated data on disability is possible with the use of the Washington Group Questions on Disability. However, data on its own is no good – we need to build capacity at school and provincial levels to be able to interpret the data in context and use it to frame actions. 
  • Resources – Governments, need to provide domestic financing to close the persistent gaps between inclusive education policy and implementation. However, it’s crucial we invest in an inclusive workforce. This means not simply training teachers to adopt more inclusive practices, which is important, but also acknowledging the very difficult contexts many teachers work in on a day -to- day basis and ensuring they have adequate support. This support in many cases might involve working with local health professionals and other specialists with the view towards supporting all children.

Finally, none of this has any meaning unless we involve persons with disabilities, particularly children, as partners and not just consumers of research. We need to see them as knowledge creators, as ultimately, they have the most important lived experiences. Any conversation on the how to implement inclusive education must include sensitivity to context and appreciation of people’s lived realities. This means using a range of approaches to gather data, which involves numbers but also narratives from people in the field.

So, as we celebrate the first anniversary of the Global Disability Summit, let’s celebrate on how far we’ve come (there was a time not so long ago when ‘disability’ was not even on the agenda), but let’s also not forget how far we have to go. If we are to translate the many promises into reality, we have to keep the momentum and energy alive. 

The Impact Initiative blog posts are either from individual researchers or from major research programmes. Some of the blog posts are original source and are written by researchers and experts connected to the two research programmes jointly funded by ESRC and DFID: the Joint Fund for Poverty Alleviation Research and the Raising Learning Outcomes in Education Systems Research Programme. Other blog posts are imported from related websites and programmes. 

The views expressed in these blogs reflect the opinions of each individual and may not represent the Institute of Development Studies, the University of Cambridge, ESRC or DFID.

Comments:

The Impact Initiative welcomes comments.  To enable a healthy environment for discussion we reserve the rights to remove comments if they are considered abusive or disruptive. All comments are reactively moderated. This means that comments are usually only checked if a complaint is made about them.